Ramaphosa's court bid to halt Phala Phala impeachment
Every station led with day two of the President's urgent application in the Western Cape High Court to interdict Parliament's Section 89 impeachment committee. Advocate Vim Trengove argued the independent panel got the test wrong, that there was insufficient evidence Ramaphosa deliberately broke the law or acted in bad faith, and that being put on trial would cause irreparable reputational harm. Opposition parties countered that the President is trying to evade accountability and that a High Court cannot override the Constitutional Court's ruling. Judgment was reserved until next week, with the substantive review set down for 2–4 September.