Power FM, Tuesday evening

A very good afternoon with your power news at 5. My name is Zulibansi Mazubugo. Attempted murder accused of Vusimuzi Cat Matlala maintains that investigators from IDAC inserted major bribery allegations into his collapsed section 204 witness statement testifying at the Madlanga Commission. Matlala dismissed some contents of that affidavit. He argued that he was coerced and did not write or willingly agree to the paragraphs linking him to corrupt dealings.

With the former Deputy National Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya. He continues to allege that IDAC investigators typed sections he never provided, intending to force him to implicate top police officials. Matala went on to say that he signed the vast stack of pages without being given the opportunity to read the document. Which parts do you not agree with? I think the second and the third sentence. The second reads: I informed him that I did not have sufficient.

Funds to do so immediately, however, that I would only be able to do so in due course and upon receipt payment, upon receipt of payment from SATS. Is it incorrect? Should it be deleted, or do you want to amend it? No, I do not want to amend it. It's incorrect. You never said that at all. Yes. So this was another one of those things inserted by IDAC. Matala.

Also denied that the impalas he gave the former deputy police commissioner were intended to secure favours from the police official. Sibiya asked me for the impalas, so that's where you have a problem. Yes, we are with only because not long thereafter, Sibiya asked me for the impalas. Okay, so the last part of that sentence. Yes. Is that to be replaced with something else, or it's not true, or it was inserted by IDAC? Yeah, it's not my statement, so it was.

Inserted only the last part. Okay. But I'm not disputing the, I'm not saying the impala story never happened, but I'm saying the way he's been put here is not true. Let me ask this: did General Sibiya at any stage ask you for impalus story? No, thank you to the story now. United Kingdom fugitive and order Nachuma has reiterated that he does not remember signing a plea and sentence agreement in relation to the possession of unlicensed firearm case. Chuma repeated this submission.