Accountability

On-air predictions, tracked to the outcome

Hosts, analysts and callers make calls on air every day — rate cuts, reshuffles, title races. We extract the falsifiable ones from the broadcast transcript, wait for the horizon, and score them against public sources. Every call keeps its audio receipt.

graded
169graded
correct
57%correct
open
83open
close this week
3close this week
30 graded in the last 7 days →

71%

of 7 graded calls were right · this filter

5 correct2 incorrect

Graded means checked against a public source after the check-by date. Verdicts judge the claim, never the person: hosts, guests and callers all count.

Correct calls, newest first1–5 of 5

Who called it

4 predictions from 2 stations · 2 yes, 2 no

  1. Mon 12 Oct, 12:25702This one

    A caller

    Yes
  2. Mon 12 Oct, 12:40SAfm

    A caller
    Yes
  3. Tue 13 Oct, 10:26702

    Manka
    No
  4. Yesterday 05:38SAfm

    A caller
    No

Reader poll opens once the result is public

A caller · 702Check by 04 Nov (est.)

The verdict· graded 01 Oct

The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) confirmed that its final report concerning investigations under Proclamation 123 of 2023—which covers corruption, unauthorized bursaries, and serious maladministration within the Free State Office of the Premier's bursary scheme for higher-education students—was

Selby Makoto · SAfmAired 28 Aug

How this works: predictions are extracted by AI from machine-generated transcripts of live broadcasts (“as heard on air” — transcription errors are possible), and outcomes are resolved against public sources, linked on each card. Speakers are named only when the broadcast itself identifies them. This page records what was said and what happened. The reader poll is audience sentiment, not odds — no money is involved and there is nothing to wager on. Corrections: [email protected].