42 stories on 2 stations in the last 30 days · all stationsfinding more
Court affair or to direct the blame to the home affairs department because there is a sense of confusion as we speak now. And then my last point is: we need a constitutional court expert, a professor for that matter, to elucidate to us whether it is possible
Judgment with which we don't have a problem. Once you've read the judgment and understood it, the court has made a ruling based on an interpretation of the Constitution. Meanwhile, at least one immigration expert says that Home Affairs' withdrawal of the
waiting when I last participated for a legal opinion about whether we can make an application to the Constitutional Court to request the Constitutional Court to adjust their order to take account of the administrative difficulties that have now been created
the IMC there is a discussion. We were waiting when I last participated for a legal opinion about whether we can make an application to the Constitutional Court to request the Constitutional Court to adjust their order to take account of the administration.
So, while they were arguing in court, what did they perceive to be the consequence of this court judgment if, in fact, the Constitutional Court confirmed what the Western Cape High Court had already found? That being said, three months ago is when the
Constitutional court ruling through the established constitutional processes. Our message tonight is therefore simple. We urge you to remain calm, remain vigilant, and remain within the law. All right, so quite a number of questions then need to be answered
The law and deliver to the public of South Africa. We cannot take aim at the Constitutional Court for doing what courts do, whether it's at the high courts, the SCA, or the Constitutional Court. That is, it is not their role to be basically to officiate over
It may be that another judgment in the Constitutional Court down the line would find another reasoning because there's so many Constitutional Court decisions. But overall, the protection afforded by the Constitution is extended to everyone within the borders
On a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers, chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Gubai, says the government has been advised that it can approach the courts. Gubai's comments follow the Constitutional Court's ruling
To apologize at this time, we're due to be speaking about the Constitutional Court ruling that has ruled against pension exclusion in divorce proceedings. So, in essence, what this court ruling is is that the Constitutional Court ruled that excluding pension
The decision of the constitutional court that this rave must cut even the people from this country, even those that are illegal in this country. Now, these institutions are going to collapse. And who are the people who are going to suffer the most? The people
Somebody sends a text, Anonymous sends a text saying: Is it possible to find out the duties of the Constitutional Court? What guides them in their deliberations to reach their judgments? The duties of the courts. What are the duties of the Constitutional
Could obtain a supervisory order on a constitutional court ruling on asylum seekers, and the basic education department says it is ready for the 2026 metric exams. With the news at 6, good evening, I'm Komojo Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain
said 10, I'm Kuru Shanaika. The Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration is providing an update on the Constitutional Court judgment on asylum seekers. This follows the Constitutional Court ruling that asylum seeker applications cannot be disqualified based on
That goes with that. So they will, I'm sure, be devoutly hoping that the Constitutional Court will agree to hear their substantive appeal. Constitutional Court's very busy research associate at the Campaign for Free Expression, Chris Oxaby. Thank you very much
75+ stories on 2 stations in the last 30 days · all stations
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
Describe what the Constitutional Court has done to our people. Yeah, but well, I was watching the press briefing this morning. Apparently, some of you guys who are upset are misinterpreting the judgment of the Constitutional Court. No, they are insulting our
over the asylum application system, and protesters are expected to hand over a memorandum at the court. Our SABC new senior reporter, Criselda Lewis, is there. Criselda, good afternoon. So, just give us a sense of what's happening on the ground outside the
this question about the Constitution. That in recent times, we've had decisions that were taken by the Constitutional Court that we, as ordinary South Africans, looked at them like, hmm is this really about us? Now, for me, it's not about the judges. The
the state, that costing the tiscoma and the previous legal processes. We've been looking a lot at the Constitutional Court over the last couple of weeks. Are there constitutional principles at stake here? Yes and no. The fact that we have this process, it
talking about. There is a lady by the name of Batabile Yamini, a minister of social development. The Constitutional Court ordered her to effect changes that company that was paying the SAFA grant. She didn't act for two years. She defied the Constitutional
it. You know, you continue, and I mean, I see a lot of people are saying that this is linked to the Constitutional Court judgment, you know, or what people understand of the Constitutional Court judgment. I mean, those people that were burning cars, if you
Act and the Constitutional Court merely corrected the process that Home Affairs were using, sadly, opportunistically, to prohibit asylum seekers from applying. So, when they made the decision in July, the apex court, the Constitutional Court spoke and said,
And say, but this infringes on my Bill of Rights, or this is unconstitutional, and then goes to the Constitutional Court to challenge it because the Constitutional Court can come back and say that this law is unconstitutional. We've seen that. It's been
Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration says it is a way of panic and confusion following the recent Constitutional Court judgment on asylum seekers and the Refugees Act. Now, the Korn Court, the Constitutional Court, ruled that parts of the Refugee Act were
But a constitutional democratic country. In other words, those people there who interpret the constitution are not above the law. Their job is to interpret the constitution. And when I'm listening to the people, people are criticizing the interpretation of
Constitutional Court, after a couple of conflicting judgments by the High Court, the Constitutional Court found in July this year that an amendment to the Refugee Act, which said that people who didn't have proper documentation or didn't come into the country
Constitutional Court. We all respect our court. What the court said is that you've got to at least give a person who claims to be a refugee or an asylum seeker, give them a chance to explain in front of a tribunal. Don't just get an official or a policeman
6 p.m. to 6 p.m. All right, we're getting. What are we going to do next? Oh, we're going to go to the Constitutional Court. There's this Constitutional Court hearing. The IEC and the ANC are arguing about the election lists. Remember, this is the lists in, was
Appeal this to the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court declines to hear the appeal because it says that the law on the technical question of whether you can order specific performance in terms of a contract is a settled question of law and therefore
4 045 older mentions across 5 months on 4 stations. Sign in to search the archive.
2 569 mentions across 6 stations, last 30 days
Named in these moments, most often first
Each opens the place's own page