44 stories on 1 station in the last 30 days · all stationsfinding more
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
Home affairs. Home affairs is abiding by a court ruling. The Constitutional Court said one, two, three. And the Constitutional Court, as I've been saying, that the Constitutional Court is implementing interpreting the laws. But the thing about what we also,
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
And say, but this infringes on my Bill of Rights, or this is unconstitutional, and then goes to the Constitutional Court to challenge it because the Constitutional Court can come back and say that this law is unconstitutional. We've seen that. It's been
And Justice Majid in the Constitutional Court agreed. Well, it's very interesting because what he said was you didn't need to bring a regulation to the Constitutional Court for confirmation. Only statutes required that constitutional invalidity to be affirmed
that application. But it is important also to concede that the Department of Home Affairs went to the Constitutional Court to oppose the proposal that was made by Scalabrini, the so-called human rights organization that got us and made the Constitutional Court
it. You know, you continue, and I mean, I see a lot of people are saying that this is linked to the Constitutional Court judgment, you know, or what people understand of the Constitutional Court judgment. I mean, those people that were burning cars, if you
Judgment with which we don't have a problem. Once you've read the judgment and understood it, the court has made a ruling based on an interpretation of the Constitution. Meanwhile, at least one immigration expert says that Home Affairs' withdrawal of the
part of the legislative arm. This is what the authorities can and cannot do. So let me ask you another question. You know, there are cases that went before the Constitutional Court, and the Constitutional Court said we are basing our decision on the basis on.
much for your indulgence and for your patience. Well, we're going to just give you a highlight of this Constitutional Court ruling that has struck down the Public Procurement Act over the flawed public participation process. Well, the Constitutional Court has
A court process on the president went to court to review that whole Constitutional Court judgment, and we'll hear how that is looking like. So, we're going to see how this is going to pan out. I hope this is not another waste of money. The president has been
The law and deliver to the public of South Africa. We cannot take aim at the Constitutional Court for doing what courts do, whether it's at the high courts, the SCA, or the Constitutional Court. That is, it is not their role to be basically to officiate over
It may be that another judgment in the Constitutional Court down the line would find another reasoning because there's so many Constitutional Court decisions. But overall, the protection afforded by the Constitution is extended to everyone within the borders
44 stories on 1 station in the last 30 days · all stations
A court process on the president went to court to review that whole Constitutional Court judgment, and we'll hear how that is looking like. So, we're going to see how this is going to pan out. I hope this is not another waste of money. The president has been
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
Home affairs. Home affairs is abiding by a court ruling. The Constitutional Court said one, two, three. And the Constitutional Court, as I've been saying, that the Constitutional Court is implementing interpreting the laws. But the thing about what we also,
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
And say, but this infringes on my Bill of Rights, or this is unconstitutional, and then goes to the Constitutional Court to challenge it because the Constitutional Court can come back and say that this law is unconstitutional. We've seen that. It's been
And Justice Majid in the Constitutional Court agreed. Well, it's very interesting because what he said was you didn't need to bring a regulation to the Constitutional Court for confirmation. Only statutes required that constitutional invalidity to be affirmed
that application. But it is important also to concede that the Department of Home Affairs went to the Constitutional Court to oppose the proposal that was made by Scalabrini, the so-called human rights organization that got us and made the Constitutional Court
it. You know, you continue, and I mean, I see a lot of people are saying that this is linked to the Constitutional Court judgment, you know, or what people understand of the Constitutional Court judgment. I mean, those people that were burning cars, if you
Judgment with which we don't have a problem. Once you've read the judgment and understood it, the court has made a ruling based on an interpretation of the Constitution. Meanwhile, at least one immigration expert says that Home Affairs' withdrawal of the
part of the legislative arm. This is what the authorities can and cannot do. So let me ask you another question. You know, there are cases that went before the Constitutional Court, and the Constitutional Court said we are basing our decision on the basis on.
much for your indulgence and for your patience. Well, we're going to just give you a highlight of this Constitutional Court ruling that has struck down the Public Procurement Act over the flawed public participation process. Well, the Constitutional Court has
The law and deliver to the public of South Africa. We cannot take aim at the Constitutional Court for doing what courts do, whether it's at the high courts, the SCA, or the Constitutional Court. That is, it is not their role to be basically to officiate over
It may be that another judgment in the Constitutional Court down the line would find another reasoning because there's so many Constitutional Court decisions. But overall, the protection afforded by the Constitution is extended to everyone within the borders
2 553 mentions across 6 stations, last 30 days
Named in these moments, most often first
Each opens the place's own page
4 028 older mentions across 5 months on 4 stations. Sign in to search the archive.
What radio said
Government may approach the courts for a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling that asylum seekers' applications cannot be rejected even if they entered irregularly, Inter-Ministerial Committee chairperson Mamoloko Kubai said 4. Home Affairs said it is abiding by a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers 3.
AI summary of the moments below, cited by number. Verify before quoting.