44 stories on 2 stations in the last 30 days · all stationsfinding more
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
Home affairs. Home affairs is abiding by a court ruling. The Constitutional Court said one, two, three. And the Constitutional Court, as I've been saying, that the Constitutional Court is implementing interpreting the laws. But the thing about what we also,
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
And say, but this infringes on my Bill of Rights, or this is unconstitutional, and then goes to the Constitutional Court to challenge it because the Constitutional Court can come back and say that this law is unconstitutional. We've seen that. It's been
And Justice Majid in the Constitutional Court agreed. Well, it's very interesting because what he said was you didn't need to bring a regulation to the Constitutional Court for confirmation. Only statutes required that constitutional invalidity to be affirmed
that application. But it is important also to concede that the Department of Home Affairs went to the Constitutional Court to oppose the proposal that was made by Scalabrini, the so-called human rights organization that got us and made the Constitutional Court
it. You know, you continue, and I mean, I see a lot of people are saying that this is linked to the Constitutional Court judgment, you know, or what people understand of the Constitutional Court judgment. I mean, those people that were burning cars, if you
Judgment with which we don't have a problem. Once you've read the judgment and understood it, the court has made a ruling based on an interpretation of the Constitution. Meanwhile, at least one immigration expert says that Home Affairs' withdrawal of the
part of the legislative arm. This is what the authorities can and cannot do. So let me ask you another question. You know, there are cases that went before the Constitutional Court, and the Constitutional Court said we are basing our decision on the basis on.
much for your indulgence and for your patience. Well, we're going to just give you a highlight of this Constitutional Court ruling that has struck down the Public Procurement Act over the flawed public participation process. Well, the Constitutional Court has
A court process on the president went to court to review that whole Constitutional Court judgment, and we'll hear how that is looking like. So, we're going to see how this is going to pan out. I hope this is not another waste of money. The president has been
The law and deliver to the public of South Africa. We cannot take aim at the Constitutional Court for doing what courts do, whether it's at the high courts, the SCA, or the Constitutional Court. That is, it is not their role to be basically to officiate over
It may be that another judgment in the Constitutional Court down the line would find another reasoning because there's so many Constitutional Court decisions. But overall, the protection afforded by the Constitution is extended to everyone within the borders
Constitutional Court · organisation
353 mentions on 6 stations in 30 days
60 stories on 2 stations in the last 30 days · all stations
A court process on the president went to court to review that whole Constitutional Court judgment, and we'll hear how that is looking like. So, we're going to see how this is going to pan out. I hope this is not another waste of money. The president has been
Municipality in terms of a bylaw, perhaps they will challenge that and maybe the Constitutional Court might rule differently if that section does not comply with Section 92. But the issue has been settled by the Constitutional Court. We cannot debate this
Is not immune from constitutional scrutiny, and that's where the courts come in. So, Parliament needs to allow the courts to take their role and interpret whether they are following the law when holding the executive accountable. So, as it stands, it may look
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
Courts. What does that do to the efficacy of the legislature, which also has a constitutional obligation to hold the executive accountable? What does it say about the efficacy of that arm of the state as far as performing that task and even its efficiency in
Home affairs. Home affairs is abiding by a court ruling. The Constitutional Court said one, two, three. And the Constitutional Court, as I've been saying, that the Constitutional Court is implementing interpreting the laws. But the thing about what we also,
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
It still has to go to the concourt, the constitutional court, for confirmation because it affects our legislation. So, the applicant was a body where they were questioning Section 50, subsection X of our Act, which talks about BE, right? And they were saying
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
Court to deliberate. We will hand down an order latest in the morning with reasons to follow because it appears that there are important principles that are emerging from this matter that merits a considered judgment. Meanwhile, the ANC spokesperson Maxeng Yi
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
Continued through several levels of South African courts as well. However, the Constitutional Court has now come in to close the door. So their latest application was for leave to appeal, and the court dismissed it with costs. They found that the matter did
And say, but this infringes on my Bill of Rights, or this is unconstitutional, and then goes to the Constitutional Court to challenge it because the Constitutional Court can come back and say that this law is unconstitutional. We've seen that. It's been
Presiding Judge Kassim Moussa. And this court is of the view that at all material times it must ensure: one, that the state is able to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and two, that your fair trial rights that you enjoy in terms of the Constitution of
And Justice Majid in the Constitutional Court agreed. Well, it's very interesting because what he said was you didn't need to bring a regulation to the Constitutional Court for confirmation. Only statutes required that constitutional invalidity to be affirmed
4 028 older mentions across 5 months on 4 stations. Sign in to search the archive.
2 565 mentions across 6 stations, last 30 days
Named in these moments, most often first
Each opens the place's own page
What radio said
Government could approach the courts for a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling that asylum seekers' applications cannot be rejected even if they entered irregularly, with Chairperson Mamoloko Kubai saying it has been advised it can do so 7. Commentators also said a court process on the president's review of a Constitutional Court judgment was under way 1.
AI summary of the moments below, cited by number. Verify before quoting.