41 stories on 2 stations in the last 30 days · all stationsfinding more
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
Home affairs. Home affairs is abiding by a court ruling. The Constitutional Court said one, two, three. And the Constitutional Court, as I've been saying, that the Constitutional Court is implementing interpreting the laws. But the thing about what we also,
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
Mistake when we think that South Africans are just angry with the Constitutional Court. And we can get all pedantic about actually how this is how it actually works. It's the Constitutional Court that does this. How South Africans experience what the
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
that application. But it is important also to concede that the Department of Home Affairs went to the Constitutional Court to oppose the proposal that was made by Scalabrini, the so-called human rights organization that got us and made the Constitutional Court
Dermino the last couple of days, and what's been happening in the Johannesburg CBD today is that the Constitutional Court was under lockdown, there were burnt tyres and a torched vehicle outside of the Constitutional Court, and that more than one person
it. You know, you continue, and I mean, I see a lot of people are saying that this is linked to the Constitutional Court judgment, you know, or what people understand of the Constitutional Court judgment. I mean, those people that were burning cars, if you
the pace of development on land already released. In papers filed before the Western Cape High Court filing a Constitutional Court ruling, the Metro says national grant funding for affordable housing has declined sharply over the past decade. The
Judgment with which we don't have a problem. Once you've read the judgment and understood it, the court has made a ruling based on an interpretation of the Constitution. Meanwhile, at least one immigration expert says that Home Affairs' withdrawal of the
Before the Western Cape High Court, rather. Following a Constitutional Court ruling, the city says national grant funding for affordable housing has declined sharply in the past decade. The Constitutional Court ordered updated reports from the city and
James Chapman represents the Scalabrini Centre who brought that initial challenge to the High Court, then confirmed in the Constitutional Court. Maybe just explain to us, James, what exactly did the Constitutional Court rule in its simplest terms? What has
There's around three weeks to go, just over until election day. And the ANC is in the Constitutional Court today. It's taken that electoral court ruling on appeal to the Constitutional Court that the Electoral Commission of South Africa must still accept its
The law and deliver to the public of South Africa. We cannot take aim at the Constitutional Court for doing what courts do, whether it's at the high courts, the SCA, or the Constitutional Court. That is, it is not their role to be basically to officiate over
74 stories on 2 stations in the last 30 days · all stations
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
Mistake when we think that South Africans are just angry with the Constitutional Court. And we can get all pedantic about actually how this is how it actually works. It's the Constitutional Court that does this. How South Africans experience what the
It may be that another judgment in the Constitutional Court down the line would find another reasoning because there's so many Constitutional Court decisions. But overall, the protection afforded by the Constitution is extended to everyone within the borders
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
The law and deliver to the public of South Africa. We cannot take aim at the Constitutional Court for doing what courts do, whether it's at the high courts, the SCA, or the Constitutional Court. That is, it is not their role to be basically to officiate over
Describe what the Constitutional Court has done to our people. Yeah, but well, I was watching the press briefing this morning. Apparently, some of you guys who are upset are misinterpreting the judgment of the Constitutional Court. No, they are insulting our
Constitutional court speaks to the law as it exists. The people who have a right or who have the ability to change the makeup of the law in general are those fellows who are in parliament. Now, what the Constitutional Court does is to look at what the law says
Do not need the Constitutional Court because what is their use? Says men take KG. Among many benefits to us as citizens of our constitutional democracy, empowers an independent judiciary to strike down unlawful government actions and protect citizens against
Home affairs. Home affairs is abiding by a court ruling. The Constitutional Court said one, two, three. And the Constitutional Court, as I've been saying, that the Constitutional Court is implementing interpreting the laws. But the thing about what we also,
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
On the constitutional court and zoom more into them and their judgment and the manner in which their judgment is undermining South African law, the constitution in general. That's why, on a daily basis, we are going to find people, all of us, more especially
Constitutional court making a judgment that sits to side and then undermines our rule of law, is acting more like maybe he's a visitor into our country. He takes a stand. The president instead of disagreeing with it, he then goes deeper to dwell into a stand
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
that application. But it is important also to concede that the Department of Home Affairs went to the Constitutional Court to oppose the proposal that was made by Scalabrini, the so-called human rights organization that got us and made the Constitutional Court
this question about the Constitution. That in recent times, we've had decisions that were taken by the Constitutional Court that we, as ordinary South Africans, looked at them like, hmm is this really about us? Now, for me, it's not about the judges. The
2 565 mentions across 6 stations, last 30 days
Named in these moments, most often first
Each opens the place's own page
4 028 older mentions across 5 months on 4 stations. Sign in to search the archive.
What radio said
Callers and commentators debated the Constitutional Court's recent judgments, with some saying South Africans blame the court when the anger is really aimed at government 2. Others argued the court only interprets existing law and that lawmakers in Parliament must change it 67, and that it cannot be blamed for immigration policy 5.
AI summary of the moments below, cited by number. Verify before quoting.