40 stories on 2 stations in the last 30 days · all stationsfinding more
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
Done ahead of the disaster that we saw. But there's a point that you made earlier on around the Constitutional Court ruling, and that the Constitutional Court ruling did not take into consideration the views of South Africans. How do you expect the
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
State. That's number one. Number two, what the courts or the Constitutional Court has said, there's certain paragraphs, I can't read them out. There's two parts. They've confirmed the Western Cape decision of 15 May 2025. That's what the Constitutional Court
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
over the asylum application system, and protesters are expected to hand over a memorandum at the court. Our SABC new senior reporter, Criselda Lewis, is there. Criselda, good afternoon. So, just give us a sense of what's happening on the ground outside the
talking about. There is a lady by the name of Batabile Yamini, a minister of social development. The Constitutional Court ordered her to effect changes that company that was paying the SAFA grant. She didn't act for two years. She defied the Constitutional
Are critical of the Constitutional Court itself. And I remember in other matters where people felt that the Constitutional Court, if I were to go back to the matter of the asylum seekers, the Constitutional Court needing to take into consideration the mood on
it. You know, you continue, and I mean, I see a lot of people are saying that this is linked to the Constitutional Court judgment, you know, or what people understand of the Constitutional Court judgment. I mean, those people that were burning cars, if you
Act and the Constitutional Court merely corrected the process that Home Affairs were using, sadly, opportunistically, to prohibit asylum seekers from applying. So, when they made the decision in July, the apex court, the Constitutional Court spoke and said,
Constitutional Court, after a couple of conflicting judgments by the High Court, the Constitutional Court found in July this year that an amendment to the Refugee Act, which said that people who didn't have proper documentation or didn't come into the country
Appeal this to the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court declines to hear the appeal because it says that the law on the technical question of whether you can order specific performance in terms of a contract is a settled question of law and therefore
6 p.m. to 6 p.m. All right, we're getting. What are we going to do next? Oh, we're going to go to the Constitutional Court. There's this Constitutional Court hearing. The IEC and the ANC are arguing about the election lists. Remember, this is the lists in, was
Court affair or to direct the blame to the home affairs department because there is a sense of confusion as we speak now. And then my last point is: we need a constitutional court expert, a professor for that matter, to elucidate to us whether it is possible
75+ stories on 2 stations in the last 30 days · all stations
on in our society, the Constitution is constantly being renewed, right? It's being renewed through the Constitutional Review Committee. When you, as citizens, if you decide you want to be an active citizen, can write to the Constitutional Review Committee. You
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
is transgressed, we've seen many cases over many years. Government departments have been taken to court to ensure that they fulfill their constitutional responsibilities. Now, it's not possible for every single case to go to court, but the courts have
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
is the problem, not the Constitution itself. Look, on the issue, you know, when matters are taken to court, in the vast majority of cases, the rights enshrined in the Constitution have been vindicated by our courts that have ensured that in the Flutboom case
Done ahead of the disaster that we saw. But there's a point that you made earlier on around the Constitutional Court ruling, and that the Constitutional Court ruling did not take into consideration the views of South Africans. How do you expect the
Today, we need to understand why the court made the decision it made, right? If you look at section 59 of the constitution and also section 72 of the constitution, it requires the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces to involve the people or
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
the people or to involve the public when making laws. That's where we the people come in. And the Constitutional Court may have not expressly said the preamble is clear, but that is probably one of the reasons why the Constitution. Constitutional Court set
State. That's number one. Number two, what the courts or the Constitutional Court has said, there's certain paragraphs, I can't read them out. There's two parts. They've confirmed the Western Cape decision of 15 May 2025. That's what the Constitutional Court
has got to do with the affording of public comments. And we've seen in other cases, Prof, where the Constitutional Court has ruled on the failing of Parliament or giving them directive on the back of a ruling that has to do with the constitutionality of a
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
10 a.m. to noon. This is a way of calling on power 987. A very big decision by the Constitutional Court yesterday. It threw out the procurement bill that was passed by Parliament back in 2024 and signed it as an act, rather, the Procurement Act that was signed
over the asylum application system, and protesters are expected to hand over a memorandum at the court. Our SABC new senior reporter, Criselda Lewis, is there. Criselda, good afternoon. So, just give us a sense of what's happening on the ground outside the
And they will be made to answer for their crimes before a court of justice. And finally, the Constitutional Court has declared the Public Procurement Act of 2024 unconstitutional following legal challenges by the Western Cape Provincial Government, as well as
4 067 older mentions across 5 months on 4 stations. Sign in to search the archive.
2 656 mentions across 6 stations, last 30 days
Named in these moments, most often first
Each opens the place's own page