43 stories on 3 stations in the last 30 days · all stationsfinding more
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
Home affairs. Home affairs is abiding by a court ruling. The Constitutional Court said one, two, three. And the Constitutional Court, as I've been saying, that the Constitutional Court is implementing interpreting the laws. But the thing about what we also,
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
Done ahead of the disaster that we saw. But there's a point that you made earlier on around the Constitutional Court ruling, and that the Constitutional Court ruling did not take into consideration the views of South Africans. How do you expect the
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
State. That's number one. Number two, what the courts or the Constitutional Court has said, there's certain paragraphs, I can't read them out. There's two parts. They've confirmed the Western Cape decision of 15 May 2025. That's what the Constitutional Court
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
CBD to the Constitutional Court. But when we arrived at the Constitutional Court, en route there, first of all, a number of shops had been closed down in the CBD. You know, most of the shops that had been operating since this morning were asked to close. As we
talking about. There is a lady by the name of Batabile Yamini, a minister of social development. The Constitutional Court ordered her to effect changes that company that was paying the SAFA grant. She didn't act for two years. She defied the Constitutional
it. You know, you continue, and I mean, I see a lot of people are saying that this is linked to the Constitutional Court judgment, you know, or what people understand of the Constitutional Court judgment. I mean, those people that were burning cars, if you
Act and the Constitutional Court merely corrected the process that Home Affairs were using, sadly, opportunistically, to prohibit asylum seekers from applying. So, when they made the decision in July, the apex court, the Constitutional Court spoke and said,
6 p.m. to 6 p.m. All right, we're getting. What are we going to do next? Oh, we're going to go to the Constitutional Court. There's this Constitutional Court hearing. The IEC and the ANC are arguing about the election lists. Remember, this is the lists in, was
Constitutional Court, after a couple of conflicting judgments by the High Court, the Constitutional Court found in July this year that an amendment to the Refugee Act, which said that people who didn't have proper documentation or didn't come into the country
Appeal this to the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court declines to hear the appeal because it says that the law on the technical question of whether you can order specific performance in terms of a contract is a settled question of law and therefore
Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration says it is a way of panic and confusion following the recent Constitutional Court judgment on asylum seekers and the Refugees Act. Now, the Korn Court, the Constitutional Court, ruled that parts of the Refugee Act were
55 stories on 3 stations in the last 30 days · all stations
The law and deliver to the public of South Africa. We cannot take aim at the Constitutional Court for doing what courts do, whether it's at the high courts, the SCA, or the Constitutional Court. That is, it is not their role to be basically to officiate over
Constitutional court speaks to the law as it exists. The people who have a right or who have the ability to change the makeup of the law in general are those fellows who are in parliament. Now, what the Constitutional Court does is to look at what the law says
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
this question about the Constitution. That in recent times, we've had decisions that were taken by the Constitutional Court that we, as ordinary South Africans, looked at them like, hmm is this really about us? Now, for me, it's not about the judges. The
Home affairs. Home affairs is abiding by a court ruling. The Constitutional Court said one, two, three. And the Constitutional Court, as I've been saying, that the Constitutional Court is implementing interpreting the laws. But the thing about what we also,
the state, that costing the tiscoma and the previous legal processes. We've been looking a lot at the Constitutional Court over the last couple of weeks. Are there constitutional principles at stake here? Yes and no. The fact that we have this process, it
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
Done ahead of the disaster that we saw. But there's a point that you made earlier on around the Constitutional Court ruling, and that the Constitutional Court ruling did not take into consideration the views of South Africans. How do you expect the
Yesterday, the Constitutional Court threw it out. And why did the Constitutional Court threw it out? It said that it basically there was insufficient public participation, that it was very flawed. The public participation process was flawed. And it's not the
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
Africans, the lived experience of South Africans, at the same time, what the law actually says. The Constitutional Court ruling, and we'll have that conversation with Prince Imdombeni. What did the ruling actually say? What did it speak to? And if there are
State. That's number one. Number two, what the courts or the Constitutional Court has said, there's certain paragraphs, I can't read them out. There's two parts. They've confirmed the Western Cape decision of 15 May 2025. That's what the Constitutional Court
leaders have to have respect for what the Constitution says. If you take a case like this, whether it's about refugees, whether it's about, I don't know, land, whatever the case may be, if you take that issue to the Constitutional Court, and the Constitution
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
They only end up at the Supreme Court of Appeal. Very, very few end up at the Constitutional Court. So it's quite crucial that it has a full complement of judges. And over the last three to five years, there have been a number of vacancies on the Supreme Court
4 050 older mentions across 5 months on 4 stations. Sign in to search the archive.
2 568 mentions across 6 stations, last 30 days
Named in these moments, most often first
Each opens the place's own page
What radio said
Government could approach the courts for a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling that asylum seekers' applications cannot be rejected even if they entered irregularly, according to Inter-Ministerial Committee chairperson Mamoloko Kubai 7. Commentators argued the court only interprets existing law and that its role is not to officiate over the immigration crisis 12.
AI summary of the moments below, cited by number. Verify before quoting.