44 stories on 3 stations in the last 30 days · all stationsfinding more
Home Affairs Department has to, one way or the other, abide by the decision of the Constitutional Court. So the Home Affairs Department was opposing this particular outcome from the onset in courts. So that makes sense, but it's my problem is: look at what is
Claims to be assessed. So, here's what the press statement by the Home Affairs Department does not do. It does not tell us what happens now. So, the people who are waiting in queues to apply, how are they to be received by the Home Affairs officers this
some asylum seekers from accessing the system were not in line with the country's constitution. The Home Affairs Department then directed its officers to allow foreign nationals to apply for asylum whether they're in the country legally or not. Dimakazolishoro
Speaks and they pass judgments. I mean, though, that's the supreme law of the land. And everyone has to observe those laws, including the Department of Home Affairs. So, if the Department of Home Affairs are not following through on the constitutional judgment
The previous news headlines that the Home Affairs Department has withdrawn the directives that it issued to process the asylum seekers applications. What does that mean? Does that mean now that those asylum seekers who are chewing outside those Department of
Issues within the department itself. I mean, I just got a glimpse of what Mr. Frederick was going. It means lifestyle audits, meaning we could be having criminals even within that department. So please, your views, you can talk to us. Thank you so much,
Yeah, because unless you are in control of the Department of Home Affairs, Department of Police, Department of Defense, and so on, you cannot necessarily influence public policy and implementation of policy the way you want to. But I mean, but I think it's
Well, for me, I think CESAS is just a waste of money because, as your guest says, there are sometimes undercounts and then they do adjustments. It means that those adjustments are just guesswork. Why don't they just maybe work with departments like the Home
Have sufficient time to properly capacitate the Home Affairs Department. Your response to that, were you threatening to take Home Affairs to court again for being in contempt of court? Well, I'm not aware of that, but obviously, when there's a court order, the
Of home affairs because I suspected they send the junior lawyers there. You think that sabotage themselves. But the good news is that the Department of Home Affairs will able to get the debt of those people who are here in this country. So if they want to
status. So, at a practical level, then what does it mean right now? What happens now if a police officer is going to find somebody who has no papers, etc.? How do things proceed, even with the Department of Home Affairs at a practical level? Okay, so the
but that they are allowed to be heard. How are you going to be responding to this? Again, in the wake of what is a situation that I think has moved far quicker than the Home Affairs Department itself was prepared to move when this directive was issued?
as the IMC, must find a balance between compliance with the court order and listening to the concerns of many South Africans. Meanwhile, Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber says the Concorde ruling does not take away the Home Affairs Department's adjudicative
BC News this morning after the Home Affairs Department withdrew a directive that had expanded access to asylum application processes following the ruling. Home Affairs, on average, rejects 95% of these types of applications that it receives because they are
Judiciary is part of the state. And they are aware that the Home Affairs Department was busy with the procedural proceedings of this matter. They should have allowed the Home Affairs to finish with the procedures and then the Home Affairs come back to them and
Department of Home Affairs · organisation
576 mentions on 6 stations in 30 days
58 stories on 3 stations in the last 30 days · all stations
Home Affairs Department has to, one way or the other, abide by the decision of the Constitutional Court. So the Home Affairs Department was opposing this particular outcome from the onset in courts. So that makes sense, but it's my problem is: look at what is
Claims to be assessed. So, here's what the press statement by the Home Affairs Department does not do. It does not tell us what happens now. So, the people who are waiting in queues to apply, how are they to be received by the Home Affairs officers this
some asylum seekers from accessing the system were not in line with the country's constitution. The Home Affairs Department then directed its officers to allow foreign nationals to apply for asylum whether they're in the country legally or not. Dimakazolishoro
Speaks and they pass judgments. I mean, though, that's the supreme law of the land. And everyone has to observe those laws, including the Department of Home Affairs. So, if the Department of Home Affairs are not following through on the constitutional judgment
The previous news headlines that the Home Affairs Department has withdrawn the directives that it issued to process the asylum seekers applications. What does that mean? Does that mean now that those asylum seekers who are chewing outside those Department of
Issues within the department itself. I mean, I just got a glimpse of what Mr. Frederick was going. It means lifestyle audits, meaning we could be having criminals even within that department. So please, your views, you can talk to us. Thank you so much,
Yeah, because unless you are in control of the Department of Home Affairs, Department of Police, Department of Defense, and so on, you cannot necessarily influence public policy and implementation of policy the way you want to. But I mean, but I think it's
Visit myhome affairs online dot dha dot gov.za to find your nearest participating bank branch and make the smart switch today. The Department of Home Affairs delivering dignity for all. Asraf Gada on SAFM. Ryan, let's move on to another issue, but I certainly
Well, for me, I think CESAS is just a waste of money because, as your guest says, there are sometimes undercounts and then they do adjustments. It means that those adjustments are just guesswork. Why don't they just maybe work with departments like the Home
Have sufficient time to properly capacitate the Home Affairs Department. Your response to that, were you threatening to take Home Affairs to court again for being in contempt of court? Well, I'm not aware of that, but obviously, when there's a court order, the
Of home affairs because I suspected they send the junior lawyers there. You think that sabotage themselves. But the good news is that the Department of Home Affairs will able to get the debt of those people who are here in this country. So if they want to
status. So, at a practical level, then what does it mean right now? What happens now if a police officer is going to find somebody who has no papers, etc.? How do things proceed, even with the Department of Home Affairs at a practical level? Okay, so the
but that they are allowed to be heard. How are you going to be responding to this? Again, in the wake of what is a situation that I think has moved far quicker than the Home Affairs Department itself was prepared to move when this directive was issued?
as the IMC, must find a balance between compliance with the court order and listening to the concerns of many South Africans. Meanwhile, Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber says the Concorde ruling does not take away the Home Affairs Department's adjudicative
BC News this morning after the Home Affairs Department withdrew a directive that had expanded access to asylum application processes following the ruling. Home Affairs, on average, rejects 95% of these types of applications that it receives because they are
Department of Home Affairs · organisation
576 mentions on 6 stations in 30 days
1 251 older mentions across 5 months on 4 stations. Sign in to search the archive.
799 mentions across 6 stations, last 30 days
Named in these moments, most often first
Each opens the place's own page
What radio said
A Constitutional Court ruling in July found legal barriers stopping some asylum seekers from accessing the system were unconstitutional, and the Home Affairs Department then directed officers not to turn away people seeking asylum regardless of how they entered the country 3. The department later withdrew those directives, prompting questions from commentators about what happens now for applicants queuing outside its offices 25. An immigration lawyer, Craig Smith, said the department would be in breach and contempt of the order if it did not follow the judgment 4.
AI summary of the moments below, cited by number. Verify before quoting.