3 stories on 1 station in the last 30 days · all stationsfinding more
Court subsequently upheld that ruling after the accused failed in their bid to have the matter dismissed. Ismail Mudiba reports. This matter involves Gupta associate Iqbal Sharma, former head of the Department of Free State Department of Rural Development.
their bid to have the matter dismissed. Ishmael Mudiba reports. This matter involves Gupta associate Iqbal Sharma, former head of the Department of Free State Department of Rural Development Peter Tabete, former Provincial Agriculture Department Chief
the matter on new facts. The Constitutional Court upheld the decision following the accused failed bid to have the matter dismissed. Ishmael Mudiba reports: This matter involves Gupta associate Iqbal Sharma, former head of the Department of Free State.
3 stories on 1 station in the last 30 days · all stations
Court subsequently upheld that ruling after the accused failed in their bid to have the matter dismissed. Ismail Mudiba reports. This matter involves Gupta associate Iqbal Sharma, former head of the Department of Free State Department of Rural Development.
their bid to have the matter dismissed. Ishmael Mudiba reports. This matter involves Gupta associate Iqbal Sharma, former head of the Department of Free State Department of Rural Development Peter Tabete, former Provincial Agriculture Department Chief
the matter on new facts. The Constitutional Court upheld the decision following the accused failed bid to have the matter dismissed. Ishmael Mudiba reports: This matter involves Gupta associate Iqbal Sharma, former head of the Department of Free State.
1 older mention across 4 months on 1 station. Sign in to search the archive.
3 mentions across 1 station, last 30 days
Named in these moments, most often first
What radio said
The Constitutional Court upheld a ruling allowing the state to reinstate the case against Gupta associate Iqbal Sharma, former head of the Free State Department of Rural Development, after the accused failed to have the matter dismissed 123. The High Court had earlier discharged the accused, finding the state had failed to present credible evidence, but the Supreme Court of Appeal found the state could reinstitute the matter on new facts 3.
AI summary of the moments below, cited by number. Verify before quoting.