44 stories on 3 stations in the last 30 days · all stationsfinding more
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
Of the Constitutional Court, where majority of the people today are able to access housing because of that constitutional court. If you look at the Constitutional Court judgment in relation to TRC, the ARV provision in terms of dealing with HIV and AIDS, where
Is whether or not the Constitutional Court has the required wisdom to deal with this very difficult situation. And by the way, it's not just this case that the Constitutional Court is being scrutinized for. It is the very purpose of the existence of the
Home affairs. Home affairs is abiding by a court ruling. The Constitutional Court said one, two, three. And the Constitutional Court, as I've been saying, that the Constitutional Court is implementing interpreting the laws. But the thing about what we also,
Because the Constitutional Court is the last line of defense. That's the highest court in the land. You can't go anywhere further. But also, you can go back to the Constitutional Court and seek constitutional clarity. We've seen that in the past. If there's
To implement that, because the Constitutional Court is the last line of defense. That's the highest court in the land. You can't go anywhere further. But also, you can go back to the Constitutional Court and seek constitutional clarity. We've seen that in the
Good afternoon. I'm Komocho Mabelani. Government could head to court to obtain a supervisory order on a Constitutional Court ruling on asylum seekers. Chairperson of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, Mamoloko Kubai, says the government has been
political oversight over that department didn't know of the implementation of a key directive from the Constitutional Court. Talking about the Constitutional Court, you'll know that a case is underway at the moment where the Constitutional Court is grappling
Mistake when we think that South Africans are just angry with the Constitutional Court. And we can get all pedantic about actually how this is how it actually works. It's the Constitutional Court that does this. How South Africans experience what the
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
must step up on this particular matter. They must be in charge. Though withdrawing or postponing the constitutional court, I mean, the instruction of the constitutional court decision is not going to change anything. We are a constitutional democracy. Whatever
Or the judges, unless you've got reason to, right? So even with the Constitutional Court, that's a judgment. There's so many Constitutional Court judgments we don't agree with. Who was that guy who killed Chris Honey? Remember that guy who killed Chris Hane?
talking about. There is a lady by the name of Batabile Yamini, a minister of social development. The Constitutional Court ordered her to effect changes that company that was paying the SAFA grant. She didn't act for two years. She defied the Constitutional
How it actually works. It's the Constitutional Court that does this. How South Africans experience what the Constitutional Court says, what the parliamentarians say, what the executives say, what the law enforcement say is as one. South Africans don't
Do you feel about something if you aren't prepared to enter the Constitutional Court with a panga? To do what with? To chop up furniture, to cut holes in the stairs, or to cut off somebody's head? Disembowel them. And the Constitutional Court is the focus of
67 stories on 3 stations in the last 30 days · all stations
Constitutional Court, was it yesterday? Yeah, the Constitutional Court, you know, no, the day before yesterday, you know, the Constitutional Court, adult men were arguing what it means to upload and submit. They were arguing, it was a serious argument. A full
Is whether or not the Constitutional Court has the required wisdom to deal with this very difficult situation. And by the way, it's not just this case that the Constitutional Court is being scrutinized for. It is the very purpose of the existence of the
Irrespective of the dumb and irresponsible behavior of some of the political parties, and that the Constitutional Court needs to strike this rule and, in the process, also persuade South Africans that it is taking the route that is best for the citizens in
is. But I think we make a mistake when we think that South Africans are just angry with the Constitutional Court. And we can get all pedantic about actually how this is. How it actually works. It's the Constitutional Court that does this. How South Africans
you have satisfied that, so meaning you have passed the procedural hurdle, it must be sent to the Constitutional Court in order for the Constitutional Court to determine whether the amendment is constitutional. Then the basic factor doctrine will come in and
It is the Constitutional Court that is under trial because for some time the Constitutional Court has been facing, I suppose, questions around whether or not it is an institute that is fit for purpose. In other words, whether or not it is an institution that
The constitutional job, the constitutional court court's job is to interpret the law. The constitutional court doesn't just interpret the law, they actually make the law. Part of the problem with constitutions is that constitutions aren't incomplete, they are
It's time for us to really have a conversation about this Constitutional Court ruling and understand it for what it is. And then also understand the understanding that has developed in South African communities, particularly black communities, about that
Mistake when we think that South Africans are just angry with the Constitutional Court. And we can get all pedantic about actually how this is how it actually works. It's the Constitutional Court that does this. How South Africans experience what the
The ruling of a constitutional court, therefore, you are taking the constitution. What we are saying is we understand that the constitutional court has the constitutional responsibility to ensure that South Africans comply with its laws and also international
party. We are applying the rules. And now that there's this dispute, we're taking it to a higher court, and that's the Constitutional Court. While I hear you and agree with you that the Constitutional Court may go for the principle of inclusivity, some may
The law and deliver to the public of South Africa. We cannot take aim at the Constitutional Court for doing what courts do, whether it's at the high courts, the SCA, or the Constitutional Court. That is, it is not their role to be basically to officiate over
Constitutional court speaks to the law as it exists. The people who have a right or who have the ability to change the makeup of the law in general are those fellows who are in parliament. Now, what the Constitutional Court does is to look at what the law says
Of the Constitutional Court, where majority of the people today are able to access housing because of that constitutional court. If you look at the Constitutional Court judgment in relation to TRC, the ARV provision in terms of dealing with HIV and AIDS, where
Home affairs. Home affairs is abiding by a court ruling. The Constitutional Court said one, two, three. And the Constitutional Court, as I've been saying, that the Constitutional Court is implementing interpreting the laws. But the thing about what we also,
4 049 older mentions across 5 months on 4 stations. Sign in to search the archive.
2 569 mentions across 6 stations, last 30 days
Named in these moments, most often first
Each opens the place's own page
What radio said
A full bench of justices at the Constitutional Court heard arguments on what it means to upload and submit 1. Callers and commentators questioned whether the court has the wisdom and credibility to handle a difficult case that is now under scrutiny 236.
AI summary of the moments below, cited by number. Verify before quoting.