44 stories on 3 stations in the last 30 days · all stationsfinding more
and we lash out perhaps at the wrong people or at the wrong issue. Because let me ask you now: where's home affairs? Where's the minister of home affairs in all of this? Because essentially, we are probably here because home affairs is where the bigger
Judiciary is part of the state. And they are aware that the Home Affairs Department was busy with the procedural proceedings of this matter. They should have allowed the Home Affairs to finish with the procedures and then the Home Affairs come back to them and
this. So, this is a judgment they have to execute as an implementing agent. I'm talking about Home Affairs, right? Home Affairs has been at pains to express the fact that there's been a lot of disinformation and misinformation about their role in this by many
Or not. And noting already the challenges in home affairs, and one could argue that the trust deficit that between home affairs and the people, and all that we've seen. Do we trust the home affairs processes to adjudicate appropriately and ethically when it
In a way, saying Home Affairs, capacitate yourself because this is what you need to do. So it doesn't have to be explicitly mentioning that they can't instruct Home Affairs, but Home Affairs knows that by this ruling, they are supposed to be capacitated. And I
the supreme law of the land. And everyone has to observe those laws, including the Department of Home Affairs. So, if the Department of Home Affairs are not following through on the constitutional judgment and the order that was passed down, they are
Now that there is another comment that we made the Minister regarding the capacity of the home affairs. He said home affairs has caused implementation of this contact decision, so my question is that why are we only looking at the capacity of home affairs? Are
court ruling, of course, Parliament has to deal with it in 24 months, but your responsibilities as home affairs continue. Right now, there are cases mounting against home affairs where you're cited as the Minister of Home Affairs, where you're not complying
The home affairs. The problem is not home affairs. The problem is the United Nations Prohibition for refugees. They are the one they granted mission with the government of South Africa. So the problem is the government of South Africa, they get granted money,
Why the protesters decided to go and protest at the Home Affairs Office? Soweto does not have a refugee reception center. So the expectation would be that there are no people queuing up seeking asylum at the Soweto Home Affairs. That's very correct. Soweto
Efficiencies of Home Affairs in as far as its processing. Yeah, no, Home Affairs has been. Yeah. Yeah, I think everybody heard exactly how I feel about Home Affairs. Sifuri, Indran Fontene. Dada Sifuri. Your guests. Hello. Yes, Nintaja Sufudi, go ahead. Hello,
We understood what it means. It says to Home Affairs: remove administrative hurdles that are likely to ensure that a deserving asylum seeker is not getting through. So that court judgment comes out. And then what has triggered this, Bongan? It's the cues at
on the 7th of July. Correct. We looked at the court judgment. We understood what it means. It says to Home Affairs: remove administrative hurdles that are likely to ensure that a deserving asylum seeker is not getting through. So that court judgment comes out.
Home affairs and launch an application. And knowing that Home Affairs doesn't have capacity, they will find themselves sitting here for six months, 12 months, three years, while waiting for those three or four people in home affairs to adjudicate their
judgment on asylum seekers. The Apex Court made a ruling that asylum seekers should be assisted at Home Affairs offices regardless of their status in the country. The decision was implemented by the Department of Home Affairs, but was met with violent
Department of Home Affairs · organisation
576 mentions on 6 stations in 30 days
61 stories on 3 stations in the last 30 days · all stations
this. So, this is a judgment they have to execute as an implementing agent. I'm talking about Home Affairs, right? Home Affairs has been at pains to express the fact that there's been a lot of disinformation and misinformation about their role in this by many
The responsibility that lies with home affairs. You also make that point, South Africans, for constitutional reform, for home affairs to balance constitutional obligations with national security and the interests of South Africans. How do they do so in this
You enter South Africa. Home affairs can if you entered illegally, or if you do not have what they call an asylum visa, or if you were not able to present yourself at Home Affairs during a certain period of time. So that judgment is saying that Home Affairs
Efficiencies of Home Affairs in as far as its processing. Yeah, no, Home Affairs has been. Yeah. Yeah, I think everybody heard exactly how I feel about Home Affairs. Sifuri, Indran Fontene. Dada Sifuri. Your guests. Hello. Yes, Nintaja Sufudi, go ahead. Hello,
Premier Panyaz Ali Soufi has committed that his office has received complaints from residents about home affairs services in Soweto. He notes that residents have expressed their unhappiness that home affairs offices are prioritizing asylum seeker applications
the supreme law of the land. And everyone has to observe those laws, including the Department of Home Affairs. So, if the Department of Home Affairs are not following through on the constitutional judgment and the order that was passed down, they are
The home affairs. The problem is not home affairs. The problem is the United Nations Prohibition for refugees. They are the one they granted mission with the government of South Africa. So the problem is the government of South Africa, they get granted money,
to that office, then you have to submit that application in person, right? And then, once you give the home affairs official your application, then this is, I think, one of the important parts of that process. They take your biometrics. What it basically means
Ruling was issued out, Home Affairs was not ready. And before the implementation, what Home Affairs was supposed to do was to get themselves ready in terms of how they're going to deal with the situation. But also, Bonnie, this ruling was not saying they must
Home Affairs doesn't seem to have enough capacity to be able to do this, nor do they seem to have the qualifications in that first-round interview. And that is based on what lawyers for human rights told us yesterday. That some Home Affairs officials are not
Now, they've been inundated with so many people in the last few days. Now, that can't be the fault of Home Affairs DG. In fact, they've had to respond now to it, and therefore, there's also been threats against them, and people have attempted to shut down the
and we lash out perhaps at the wrong people or at the wrong issue. Because let me ask you now: where's home affairs? Where's the minister of home affairs in all of this? Because essentially, we are probably here because home affairs is where the bigger
Judiciary is part of the state. And they are aware that the Home Affairs Department was busy with the procedural proceedings of this matter. They should have allowed the Home Affairs to finish with the procedures and then the Home Affairs come back to them and
In a way, saying Home Affairs, capacitate yourself because this is what you need to do. So it doesn't have to be explicitly mentioning that they can't instruct Home Affairs, but Home Affairs knows that by this ruling, they are supposed to be capacitated. And I
Now that there is another comment that we made the Minister regarding the capacity of the home affairs. He said home affairs has caused implementation of this contact decision, so my question is that why are we only looking at the capacity of home affairs? Are
Department of Home Affairs · organisation
576 mentions on 6 stations in 30 days
3 340 older mentions across 5 months on 4 stations. Sign in to search the archive.
2 289 mentions across 6 stations, last 30 days
Named in these moments, most often first
Each opens the place's own page
What radio said
A Constitutional Court judgment requires Home Affairs to reopen asylum applications and process them, including interviews and fact-checking, but it does not automatically grant asylum 3. A guest argued the department would be in breach and contempt of the order if it fails to comply 6, and a Kaya 959 premier said his office had received complaints about Home Affairs prioritising asylum applications over local services 5.
AI summary of the moments below, cited by number. Verify before quoting.