Accountability

On-air predictions, tracked to the outcome

Hosts, analysts and callers make calls on air every day — rate cuts, reshuffles, title races. We extract the falsifiable ones from the broadcast transcript, wait for the horizon, and score them against public sources. Every call keeps its audio receipt.

Recently resolved

The verdict· graded 29 Aug

South Africa beat New Zealand at DHL Stadium in the second Test on 29 August 2026.

The claim said the All Blacks would defeat the Springboks, but the recorded result was the opposite: South Africa won that second Test in Cape Town. Because the match was completed and the final score went against the prediction, the claim is false.

Errol · 70229 Aug

The verdict· graded 22 Aug

The All Blacks defeated the Springboks 33–16 on 2026-08-22 at Ellis Park in Johannesburg.

The claim got the winner wrong: it predicted a Springboks victory, but the All Blacks won instead. The date matched, but the result went the opposite way, with a 33–16 loss for South Africa.

Readers: 100% said yes · 4 votes

A guest · 70222 Aug

The verdict· graded 22 Aug

New Zealand beat South Africa 33-16 at Ellis Park on 2026-08-22, a 17-point margin rather than two points.

The claim predicted a two-point margin, but the actual result was a 17-point New Zealand win. That means the speaker got the margin wrong, not just the winner.

Readers: 0% said yes · 1 vote

Tolikele · 70222 Aug

How this works: predictions are extracted by AI from machine-generated transcripts of live broadcasts (“as heard on air” — transcription errors are possible), and outcomes are resolved against public sources, linked on each card. Speakers are named only when the broadcast itself identifies them. This page records what was said and what happened. The reader poll is audience sentiment, not odds — no money is involved and there is nothing to wager on. Corrections: [email protected].